Friday 4 November 2016

How US Fund Managers Changed Strategies before, during and after the Financial Crisis -The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions

Contact Your Financial Adviser Money Making MC
4 November 2016
 
Financial Crisis (The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions)
Do fund managers consider momentum/contrarian strategy in their trading? Do these strategies remain constant or are they dependent on the market conditions? Does financial crisis make them behave differently? Do fund managers really make good decisions on strategy selection, to respond market change? To explore these issues, Luyue Jin, Cheng Zhen, Mengyao Xu, Xiaoyu Wang, Yaolin Wang conducted a study, “Mutual Fund Managers’ Choice of Momentum Strategy- Pre/During/Post Financial Crisis”. They studied the US data from September 2003 to March 2013 which was divided into three periods: pre-crisis (September 2003 to September 2007), during the crisis (October 2007 to February 2009) and post-crisis (March 2009 to March 2013). The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions

September 2003 is chosen as the starting point of sample period to exclude any influence from the previous dot-com crisis. From 2003 March, the stock market moved up until September 2007, when the market index reached its all-time high. The ending point of the sample period, March 2013, is the month when the market index went up as high as it was in September 2007, for the first time after the crisis.

The study involved a total of 207 mutual fund schemes, selected on three criteria: the offer date before September 2003, the scheme should be a growth or a value fund and its total net asset should be higher than $10 million. An alternate way in which the samples were divided was through their market-capitalisation. Also, UMD (up-minus-down), SML (security market line), HML (high-minus-low) historical monthly data and historical benchmark rates, excess market returns and risk-free rates, were collected from Kenneth R French Data Library. The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions

The writers of the paper picked all the schemes and tested each scheme for the whole period to check the significance of the coefficient of UMD to see whether the fund managers take momentum or contrarian strategy in their trading. The fund managers were then classified into three groups, momentum strategy (significantly positive coefficient), contrarian strategy (significantly negative coefficient) and no momentum (not significantly different from zero) consideration. The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions

Momentum in a stock is described as the tendency of the stock price to continue rising or to continue falling, based on the direction it initially is in. Thus, momentum strategy aims to capitalise from the continuing trends in the market. Contrarian strategy follows a method where purchasing and selling is done in contrast to the prevailing market sentiments. ‘No strategy’ refers to the mutual fund schemes whose managers didn’t follow either of these two strategies. By comparing the percentage of each strategy being followed, its popularity is gauged. The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions

Since the schemes are divided into three categories on the basis of the strategy, alpha can be estimated for each of the category and, if there is significant difference in returns by one strategy from the other two, that particular strategy has some significance. Which strategy produced the highest alpha under what situation was also determined. After dividing the mutual funds into various groups and segments, it was found that fund managers preferred momentum strategy before the financial crisis and shifted to ‘no strategy’ during crisis and moved to contrarian strategy after the crisis. The contrarian strategy usually becomes significant in the long run; thus, there is a fair question whether the fund managers realised this and adopted it during the financial crisis. The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions


The paper concluded that the strategies opted by fund managers are dependent on the market and they shift their strategies along with the changes in situation. The study explored a combination of 27 different ways by taking three different sub-periods during which the dominant strategy changed as well. Lastly, the shift in strategy influences a fund’s performance. Managers, who shifted to no strategy during crisis or to contrarian strategy after crisis, had an improved performance, to a large extent. The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions

No comments:

Post a Comment