Monday, 5 December 2016

Why RBI must abolish disruptive modes of liquidity absorption-The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions

Contact Your Financial Adviser Money Making MC
5 December 2016
 
R.B.I (The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions) 
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) should either reduce or abolish the incremental cash reserve ratio (CRR) for banks with immediate effect because it is putting enormous strain on the banking system and instead, the central bank should adopt a non-disruptive mode of liquidity absorption, says a research note. The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions

In the Ecowrap report, State Bank of India (SBI), says, though, banks have received ample deposits during 16th September to 11 November 2016 period (Rs3.76 lakh crore) and post demonetization (Rs8.1 lakh crore during 10-27 November 2016), incremental CRR is putting an enormous strain on the banking system. "Due to incremental CRR, for every Rs100 incremental growth in deposits banks have to maintain of Rs124.75 (CRR=Rs4 + statutory liquidity ratio (SLR)=Rs20.75 + incremental CRR=Rs100). Thus, for the accretion of Rs3.76 lakh crore in deposits, banks have to maintain Rs4.69 lakh crore in regulatory ratios. Apart from this, banks will have to maintain 70% liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) depending upon the category of the incremental liability," the report says. The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions
 
Liquidity (The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions)
To manage the excess liquidity in the system due to demonetisation, the central bank has revised ceiling for issue of securities under the market stabilisation scheme (MSS) to Rs6 lakh crore from Rs3,000 crore. On 2 December 2016, the RBI absorbed Rs20,000 crore by issuance of 28 days cash management bills (CMBs) and also has announced the auction of the 35 days CMB for a notified amount of Rs60,000 crore. In addition to the Rs2.09 lakh crore outstanding under reverse repo, RBI also has auctioned four government papers on 2 December 2016 and sucked Rs13,915 crore of liquidity from the system. The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions

SBI says, "We understand the current predicament of RBI in managing liquidity and hence would not be surprised if the 50 basis points (bps) rate cut is factored with a widening of repo-reverse repo corridor to 100 basis points. This could achieve a nice trade-off between an aggressive repo rate cut and a lower reverse repo rate. This would also hasten a downward trend in G-sec yield movements, a crucial factor in higher provisioning by banks in the quest for balance sheet clean-up." The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions

"Our estimate indicates that between 10th November to 30 December 2016, banks will receive around Rs12.94 lakh crore as deposits in the form of high denomination notes," SBI says, adding, "Even if we safely assume 85% withdrawal rate, the deposits that will be kept with banks will be Rs1.94 lakh crore, of which banks have to keep Rs48,100 crore in the form of CRR and SLR investments. Hence, the net liquidity that will remain in the system will be Rs1.46 lakh crore. Of this, even if we assume a trend credit growth, and Rs42,000 crore of auction of G-secs in December 2016, with the ceiling of Rs6 lakh crore under MSS, RBI can thus easily absorb the excess liquidity from market." The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions


According to SBI, capital outflows of around $7 billion have possibly put the RBI in a policy dilemma to cut rates aggressively in the forthcoming 7 December 2016 monetary policy. "With the 10-year yield differential between US and India now declining to around 390 bps from an average of around 584 bps, there is now a danger of sustained capital outflows. We however believe that such a fear is unwarranted. Consider this data. In FY16, the yield differential was 562 bps, still there was a portfolio capital outflow of $2.5 billion. How can one then explain such a contrarian analogy? Thus, we are factoring in a repo rate cut of 50 bps on 7th December by RBI," it concluded.The Total Investment & Insurance Solutions

No comments:

Post a Comment